ZeroJustice.com
Vote
 
The Real Story of David Rogers
 
 
 


Lost

Part1 flyer

Part 2 flyer

“Zero” Justice.

Rehn

No justice served under the David Roger term as District Attorney.

Richard Hinger was set free after serving only 12 years. He was sentenced to four life sentences for the brutal murders of Scott Rehn and Jimmy Sorenson.
Judge Sally Loehrer, liked the murals Richard Hinger painted on the prison walls and was tired of dealing with his many appeals.  Eric Jorgenson the prosecuting attorney didn’t even notify the family so we could be there to reject this decision. The district attorney office neglected to even file a return. The parole board was never notified. What a joke our Justice system is. In trying to find answers to our dilemma we tried to contact David Roger. He wouldn’t even talk to us. He sent his underlings. They indicated that we should be honored to speak to the likes of them.
Would you vote for someone that wouldn’t even give you the time of day. This man, David Roger, is not on the side of Justice. He is simply a shield for the criminal.. Please take a good look at the justice system in Las Vegas and across this once great country. We need to stand up and cry out for justice in the courts. Our so-called justice system release murders, rapist, robbers, child molesters. They are set free to commit the same crime over and over again.    They are so protected by the law (written by the attorneys and approved by the government, we the innocent victims don’t have a chance). If we had more justice we would have less crime.  
Stop David Roger from serving another term as district attorney. He does not serve justice.

The family and friends of Scott Rehn
Sidney Reynolds, Scott Rehn’s mother.


Heather

Slaying Victim's Daughter - failed by the Justice System...

By GLENN PUIT REVIEW-JOURNAL.(article appeared in the Las Vegas Review Journal on Sunday May 21, 2006) More than a decade ago, Heather Rehn-Bonwell sat in court and watched as her father's killers were sentenced to life in prison for a double-slaying.
Nearly 12 years later, Rehn-Bonwell said she was shocked to learn that one of those killers, Richard Hinger, now is a free man. "We were originally told he was going to do 40 years, minimum," Rehn-Bonwell said.. "Now he's free. No parole, no probation, no nothing," the Henderson resident said.
Making matters worse, Rehn-Bonwell said, is that she and her family weren't notified of the release of Hinger, 69, until more than a month after the fact.
"We didn't even know about it," Rehn-Bonwell said.
Hinger's defense attorney, Federal Public Defender Franny Forsman, could not be reached for comment.
Clark County prosecutor Eric Jorgenson said evidentiary problems in the old case prompted presecuters to tender a second-degree murder plea to Hinger in January after it became clear to authorities that he was likely going to get a new trial.
When Hinger went back before a judge for resentencing as part of the plea deal in January, District Judge Sally Loehrer sentenced him to 12 years in prison.
With credit for the 12 years he served in prison, and good behavior time he'd accumulated in jail, Hinger was free to go.
"I felt that he was a very low risk as far as danger to the community," Loehrer said Tuesday when contacted fby the Review Journal.
It was not clear where Hinger lives. Rehn-Bonwell said she thought Hinger was still in Las Vegas. Others had heard he is living in Illinois.

More on the About the Crime page (Click Here)

State Law Violated by District Attorney!!

NRS 176.015 Prompt hearing; court may commit defendant or continue or alter bail before hearing; statement by defendant; presentation of mitigating evidence; rights of victim; notice of hearing.
1. Sentence must be imposed without unreasonable delay. Pending sentence, the court may committ the defendant or continue or alter the bail.
2. Before imposing sentence, the court shall:
(a) Afford counsel an opportunity to speak on behalf of the defendant; and
(b) Address the defendant personally and ask him if he wished to make a statement in his own behalf and to present any information in mitigation of punishment.
3. After hearing any statements presented pursuant to subsection 2 and before imposing sentence, the court shall afford the victim an opportunity to:
(a) Appear personally, by counsel or by personal representative; and
(b) Reasonably express any views concerning the crime, the person responsible, the impact of the crime on the victim and the need for restitution.
4. The prosecutor shall give reasonable nitice of the hearing to impose sentence to:
(a) The person against whom the crime was committed;
(b) A person who was injured as a direct result of the commission of the crime;
(c) The surviving spouse, parents or children of a person who was killed as a direct result of the commission of the crime; and
(d) Any other relative or victim who requests in writing to be notified of the hearing.

Any defect in notice or failure of such persons to appear are not grounds for an appeal or the granting of a writ of habeas corpus. All personal information, including but not llimited to, a current or former address, which pertains to a victim or relative and which is received by the prosecutor pursuant to this subsection is confidential.